Lord and Lady Arbuthnot spent two days at the event and received expenses worth 1,488.20 from Tertulias. There is little information publicly available about Arat, given Guernseys secrecy laws. 3 - Why are there no readily available mug shots on the Internet when using search keywords - District Judge Vanessa Baraitser and Vanessa Baraitser 4 - The Wikipedia profile on the judge is selective and does not provide any personal data and background profile. This cookie is used to track how many times users see a particular advert which helps in measuring the success of the campaign and calculate the revenue generated by the campaign. When District Judge Vanessa Baraitser, appointed by Chief Magistrate Lady Emma Arbuthnot, asked the prosecution and defence if they had anything to bring before the court, Assange's lawyer. The case is sent back to the Magistrates Court with instruction to issue the extradition order. This cookie is used to measure the number and behavior of the visitors to the website anonymously. The cookie is set by addthis.com to determine the usage of Addthis.com service. [bauaw] Bay Area United Against War Newsletter, March 2, 2023. According to a statement given toPrivate Eye, she stepped asidebecauseof a perception of bias, but it was not elucidated what this related to. The only known photograph of district judge Vanessa Baraitser who will rule on Julian Assanges extradition to the U.K. in the public domain. The warrant related to Assange skipping bail to claim asylum in the Ecuadorian embassy, where the Ecuadorian government agreed that he was at risk of political persecution in the United States. Julian Assange suffers a transient ischemic attack (TIA) on the first day. 31 July 2020 Assange's judge Vanessa Baraitser is based at Westminster Magristrates Court (Photo: MOJ) Declassified has also discovered that the judge, Vanessa Baraitser, has ordered extradition in 96% of the cases she has presided over for which information is publicly available. Mr Assange, 50, married Stella Moris on Wednesday in Belmarsh prison, where he has been held since 2019. A judge in the United Kingdom will allow Wikileaks publisher Julian Assange to argue that he was offered a pardon by U.S. President Donald Trump in exchange for issuing a statement that Russia was not the source of leaks beneficial to Trump's 2016 campaign.. District Judge Vanessa Baraitser signed off on the request made by Assange's defense team during a Wednesday court appearance that . Baraitser has been criticised for a number of her judgments so far concerning Assange, who has been incarcerated in a maximum security prison, HMP Belmarsh in London, since April 2019. Standing to her right is Tertulias chairman, Lord Arbuthnot. 10 December 2021:The decision to discharge the extradition request is overturned by the High Court due to the United States Government issuing so-called diplomatic assurances to the UK Government. The family were apartheid dissidents in South Africa, and her father is an eminent geneticist. It is unclear why the HM Courts and Tribunals Service would hold only partial information on Baraitser, but not on Barron. Indeed the average proprietor of a rural car wash has left more evidence of their existence and life history on the internet than Vanessa Baraitser. That struck me, too, though I wondered whether it was a deliberate obfuscation. Brits, judges included, are still just lap dogs for America. Mr Assange's case will now go back to District Judge Vanessa Baraitser, the original judge who. His predecessor Sir Alan Duncan attended the previous forum in Malaga. Lady Arbuthnot has refused to declare any conflicts of interest in the case. He is wanted over the publication of thousands of classified documents relating to the Afghanistan and Iraq wars. Apparently not, as anyone can see that Julian Assange has had his rights taken away and the curious legal system would prefer to have him offd by the United States. Baraitser has ordered the extradition of defendants to at least 11 countries in this period, including one person to the U.S. Six of the extraditions, or 26 percent of the rulings, were successfully appealed. The cookie is set by pubmatic.com for identifying the visitors' website or device from which they visit PubMatic's partners' website. When Julian struggled to speak, he couldn't get words out, even stumbling over his name and date of birth. The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. Declassified is now publishing a photo of Truss giving a speech at the 2014 Tertulias forum in the Guggenheim museum in Bilbao. , a Spanish law professor who is also a board member of the Spanish Ministry of Defence. . 20 April 2022:The Magistrate issues the extradition order, which is sent to Home Secretary Priti Patel for approval. This district judge has a record of nodding through extradition cases, including several that have recently been overturned on appeal by a higher court. This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. Lady and Lord Arbuthnot attend the Queens garden party at Buckingham Palace in May 2017. Magistrate Vanessa Baraitser had just made a ruling that the names of Julian Assange's partner and young children could be published, which she stated was in the interests of "open justice." or an itinerary for the Bilbao meeting, DEFRA responded: Following a search of our paper and electronic records, we have established that the informationyou have requested is not held by DEFRA. It is unclear if Truss used a private email to organise the visit. Amnesty is on board and mainstream media is showing signs of deep instability regarding Assange. Articles copied from Draft Namespace on Wikipedia could be seen on the Draft Namespace of Wikipedia and not main one. The sparse information available on the meeting, which largely comes from social media, suggests that Lady Arbuthnot may not have attended the discussions since there was a separate spouses/partners, Declassified has discovered that the addresses given by Lord Arbuthnot and other parliamentarians for. . , a forum established by the UK and Turkish governments for high level individuals involved in politics and business. He cited examples of judgements made by the House of Lords and Privy Council where treaty rights were deemed enforceable despite the lack of incorporation into domestic legislation, particularly in order to stop people being extradited to potential execution from British colonies. In a Monday decision published online, judge Vanessa Baraitser said that while she has "no reason to doubt" that he would receive a fair trial, "it would be oppressive to extradite him" to the U.S . 1. The new revelations follow previous investigations by Declassified showing that Lady Arbuthnot received gifts and hospitality in relation to her husband from a military and cybersecurity company exposed by WikiLeaks. The appointment of Baraitser to preside over the Assange case remains controversial and the decision untransparent. The UK delegation to the 2014 meeting in Istanbul was led by Prince Andrew, who also hosted the Tatlidil in Edinburgh the previous year. Lord Arbuthnot described the purpose of the visit as to promote and further bilateral relations between Britain and Turkey at a high level. I hope I live long enough to see these evil people get their comeuppance. pic.twitter.com/a8EbIIToE5, GBC News (@GBCNewsroom) October 27, 2018. District judge Vanessa Baraitser rules that extradition is barred under the 2003 Extradition Act because it is opressive (s.91). [2] Juan Passarelli tweeted: On 28 October 2019, John Pilger described the disturbing scene inside a London courtroom the previous week when the WikiLeaks publisher, Julian Assange, appeared at the start of a landmark extradition case that will define the future of free journalism: "The worst moment was one of a number of 'worst' moments. She has refused to recuse herself despite an obvious conflict of interest stemming from her husband's former job as a Conservative Defence Minister and his work with the Henry Jackson . To optimize ad relevance by collecting visitor data from multiple websites such as what pages have been loaded. Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features. Declassified has discovered that the addresses given by Lord Arbuthnot and other parliamentarians for Tertulias and Tatlidil have been the same despite no obvious connection between the two organisations other than the UK Foreign Office. The United States Government appeals. If our countries survive with a legal system intact (debatable in US with BLM and Defund Police)- how can they claim hegemony when challenged by China if they are in violation of their own laws in such a publicly blatant way? The Respondents are the Government of the United States and the Secretary of State for the Home Department, Priti Patel. The chief magistrate, however, is aware of the judicial conduct guidance that advises on avoiding the perception of bias and is not hearing the case. Lady Arbuthnot has refused to declare any conflicts of interest in the case. Sign up to receive Declassifieds monthly newsletterhere. 14 March 2022:The Supreme Court refuses Julian Assange permission to appeal the High Courts decision. The cookie is used to calculate visitor, session, campaign data and keep track of site usage for the site's analytics report. His predecessor Sir Alan Duncan, Duncan, who has now left office, personally. What we do not see are the events in 2021, where the U.S. government overturned the ruling and Julian was denied an appeal before the U.K. Supreme Court in . A Google search lists more extradition requests that Baraitser did not grant. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously. She then denied Julian's lawyers any more time to prepare their case - even though their client was prevented in prison from receiving legal documents and other tools with which to defend himself. The overriding accusation that Assange was seeking to harm the political and military interests of the United States was in the very definition of a political offence in all the authorities. It is therefore more than surprising that the first refusal argued that, for the purposes of the FOIA, there is no public body here subject to disclosure., The barrister added: The alternative argument on data doesnt stack up. This cookie is used by the website's WordPress theme. The judge said that the court believes Mr. Assange's rights would be protected on US soil, and that there's no evidence suggesting that he wouldn't get a fair trial in the US. (and your PS was spot-on! Her junior judge, Vanessa Baraitser, dismissed Assange's lawyers' complaints about limited access to their client, his physical and mental condition, and the confiscation of his legal notes. This is a Lijit Advertising Platform cookie. Fitzgerald declined to agree, saying the Act did not say extradition for political offences could not be banned by the treaty enabling extradition. Keep Consortium News going in the tradition of Bob Parry. I accept that Mr Assange had expressed fears of being returned to the United States from a very early stage in the Swedish extradition proceedings but I do not find that Mr Assanges fears were reasonable, she said. The appeal will challenge the 2021 decision of District Judge Vanessa Baraitser who said that Assange could be extradited to the US but barred it on mental health grounds, agreeing that he could self-harm if sent to face trial. The hope is the samizdat on the internet, where fine disobedient journalism is still practised. Liz Truss, Lady Arbuthnot, Lord Arbuthnot, and the Foreign Office, did not respond to requests for comment. Lord Arbuthnot was from 2016-17 a director of SC Strategy, a consultancy created by Sir John Scarlett, the former head of MI6 who had been behind the dodgy dossier used by Tony Blair to push for war with Iraq.
Rheumatologist Canterbury, Articles J